Airplane Day:Responses to comments on youtube vid "no plane hit WTC second tower"
overview
I firmly believe planes did not bring down the World Trade Center towers. By that I mean airliners may have hit the WTC towers, but planes didn't cause the towers to collapse.
My basic reasoning: pancakes don't explode.
Nowadays, I'm not so sure that the airplanes were fake, but for a while I thought it was plausible. At that time, I uploaded a video I found online and called it no plane hit WTC second tower.
I copied the vid from somewhere and just wanted people to watch the first 60 seconds, as it says in the description. I didn't realize how illegible the text on the vid would be when uploaded to youtube. But, the text on the vid basically says
on the vid
|
my comments
|
And, to be quite clear, I wasn't impressed with the stuff after the first 60 seconds. It looks flashy and stupid, as opposed to the clear explosion happening in slow motion at the beginning of the video.
Despite these problems with the video, and despite all the nasty comments it's gotten, I'm choosing to leave it up on You Tube because I hate to see the tersely unhelpful message "this video has been removed by the user." Plus, I think it's important that we do ask questions about Airplane Day. Even if this vid is on the lunatic fringe, I hope it will encourage people to ask questions and get to the truth of what happened.
comments on the video
Most of the comments are just people spouting their anger about the horror of Airplane Day. To be honest, the attacks saying that I'm a terrible person are hard for me to read; when I get messages in my inbox that I have comments on the vid, I think "oh great, more abuse," but I still read them. I just try to realize people aren't attacking me so much as the event, and perceived attacks on their perception of what happened.
BUT, I'd like to respond to some of the comments, not that people will likely read this, but that they have the option.
why did they do it?
Basically I think it was done to make money:
- insurance payments for the WTC owner
- years of war profits by going into Iraq, etc
- and some say to get gold that was stored at the site, but I don't know where to get credible info on that.
the plane hit the other side
No. One day I'll find a video that shows the exact same angle with the plane included. So the question becomes "was the plane added or a plane subtracted from the original vid?"
I think it would be easier to add a plane than to subtract a plane, but I'm not video editing expert; I certainly can't edit vids beyond cropping them.
how can you say it was fake? thousands of people died!
The vid says the planes were fake, not that the towers weren't destroyed. I admire the courage of heroes (fire fighters, etc) who put their lives at risk to save others. I'm simply suggesting that planes aren't what caused the destruction; the building were destroyed with explosives.
**!!** #$%!!# you ***** ###** your $$$!!#$$ **@#$!!!
I understand you're angry about the loss of innocent lives. I'm angry about it too.
comments on this wiki entry
Comments on this wiki entry can be made by clicking "discussion" above. Rude comments need not apply.